Logo

Description

Voluntary carbon markets are ramping up efforts to credit soil carbon removal, with federal lawmakers and state regulators eager to follow suit.

Most of the enthusiasm centers on agricultural practices like reducing tillage intensity, planting cover crops, and improving grazing management. These practices have the potential to simultaneously increase soil health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance carbon sinks — a seemingly win-win solution.

Improving soil health and ecosystems is unequivocally positive. But determining when certain agricultural practices actually increase carbon stocks, and how to measure and credit their gains, remains exceedingly complex.

A number of protocols for crediting soil carbon have emerged to tackle this complexity. To help address the opacity in today’s market, (carbon)plan systematically reviewed 14 soil carbon protocols on 33 technical dimensions. In this guide you’ll find the results of this research and concrete help for evaluating your soil carbon offsetting choices.

 

Photo by Jan Kopřiva on Unsplash

View tool

2084 members are now active on 4returns.earth, connecting, sharing their field experiences, and creating new opportunities and initiatives together.

Join us by signing up as a member, or follow our work in the newsletter

Related Tools

All tools

More related resources

iSDAsoil: farm-scale soil maps across Africa

toolbox

mapping & analytical tool

learning and impact

No reviews

Farmers for biodiversity: herb-rich grassland

stories

Netherlands (Utrecht)

learning and impact, restoring nature

The Regenerative Practitioner Series

courses

Over 5 months, 10x2-hour dialogue sessions & a 3-day workshop

regenerating farms, restoring nature

No reviews

Tag a friend?