Description

Voluntary carbon markets are ramping up efforts to credit soil carbon removal, with federal lawmakers and state regulators eager to follow suit.

Most of the enthusiasm centers on agricultural practices like reducing tillage intensity, planting cover crops, and improving grazing management. These practices have the potential to simultaneously increase soil health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance carbon sinks — a seemingly win-win solution.

Improving soil health and ecosystems is unequivocally positive. But determining when certain agricultural practices actually increase carbon stocks, and how to measure and credit their gains, remains exceedingly complex.

A number of protocols for crediting soil carbon have emerged to tackle this complexity. To help address the opacity in today’s market, (carbon)plan systematically reviewed 14 soil carbon protocols on 33 technical dimensions. In this guide you’ll find the results of this research and concrete help for evaluating your soil carbon offsetting choices.

 

Photo by Jan Kopřiva on Unsplash

View tool

1643 members are now active on 4returns.earth, connecting, sharing their field experiences, and creating new opportunities and initiatives together.

Join us by signing up as a member, or follow our work in the newsletter

Related Tools

All tools

Land degradation neutral world

toolbox

educational tool

learning and impact, restoring nature

No reviews

Diversity for Restoration

toolbox

mapping & analytical tool

restoring nature

No reviews

More related resources

Searching for swamp farming in The Netherlands

stories

Netherlands (Utrecht)

learning and impact, regenerating farms

Eratamare, a healthy savannas in Kenya

landscapes

Kenya (Nakuru County)

doing business, finding funds, inspiring community, learning and impact, mobilising people, partnering, regenerating farms, restoring nature

LandScale

toolbox

mapping & analytical tool

learning and impact

No reviews

Tag a friend?